Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix/search_from_GUI #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024
Merged

fix/search_from_GUI #30

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Nov 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced message processing for play queries, improving the categorization of intent matches.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected parameters used in message forwarding, ensuring accurate data handling in the messaging system.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the handle_play_search method in the OCPPipelineMatcher class located in ocp_pipeline/opm.py. The method's message emission process has been updated to utilize different parameters, specifically changing from intent_type and intent_data to match_type and match_data. This adjustment reflects a potential reorganization in how intent matches are processed within the messaging system, but no other logic or control flow alterations are present.

Changes

File Change Summary
ocp_pipeline/opm.py Updated handle_play_search method to change message emission parameters from intent_type and intent_data to match_type and match_data.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant OCPPipelineMatcher
    participant MessageBus

    User->>OCPPipelineMatcher: send play search message
    OCPPipelineMatcher->>MessageBus: emit message.forward(match.match_type, match.match_data)
    MessageBus-->>OCPPipelineMatcher: confirmation
Loading

🐰 In the meadow where bunnies play,
A change was made, hip-hip-hooray!
From intent to match, the message flows,
With data that better knows!
So let us hop and dance with glee,
For updates bring us harmony! 🌼✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffc9f43 and 6e9cc7b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ocp_pipeline/opm.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ocp_pipeline/opm.py (1)

486-486: LGTM! The message forwarding parameter change looks correct.

The change from intent_type/intent_data to match_type/match_data aligns with the method's logic, as it's using the match object returned by _process_play_query. This makes the code more consistent with the actual data being passed.

Let's verify the usage of these attributes in the message handlers:

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for the message handlers that process the forwarded message to ensure they expect match_type/match_data.


Let me check what _process_play_query returns to verify the match object structure.


Let me try searching with ripgrep instead.


The change from intent to match attributes is correct and consistent with the codebase

The verification confirms that:

  1. _process_play_query returns an IntentHandlerMatch object with match_type and match_data attributes
  2. The returned match object is correctly forwarded using these attributes in handle_play_search
  3. The match types follow expected patterns (e.g., "ocp:resume", "ocp:search_error")
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify message handlers are using match_type/match_data
# Test: Search for message handlers that process these messages
rg -A 5 "def handle_.*_intent.*message.*Message"

Length of output: 3754


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for handlers of forwarded messages from handle_play_search
rg -A 10 "def handle_play_search"

Length of output: 779


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _process_play_query implementation
ast-grep --pattern $'def _process_play_query($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for _process_play_query implementation
rg -A 20 "_process_play_query"

Length of output: 4274


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit f408feb into dev Nov 17, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant